Final Review: Di (3/22/2012) 

Jacque Fresco-Language in Transition, Research, Animal Testing, Energy Comparison-Oct 25, 2011 - Proofing Notes

06:10.060 - 06:14.320
Every vaccination that you get has been tried on animals

06:40.660 - 06:44.460
You say "Well, maybe we can build an artificial blood circuit."

07:47.690 - 07:51.100
and people say "Well, I don't believe in killing animals."

09:44.610 - 09:46.610
they want to know what the figures are

10:00.720 - 10:04.490
what kind of new materials can we develop

11:18.160 - 11:20.590
that they can stop us from putting it up

00:51.310- 00:54.442 - As long as 'subject to interpretation' language
00:51.310- 00:54.442 - As long as there is subject to interpretation language - shouldn't it be like this? Yes, I agree, GJ ! 
00:54.770 - 00:59.240 - you're going to have wide variations in human conclusions.

01:58.670 - Talk about the role of research in the future in this type of society. How would the findings of behavioral research influence society? - is he commanding him to talk? I think there's a word missing for the recording that could be one of the examples underneath: 
You/There is/We talk about the role of research in the future in this type of society. How would the findings of behavioral research influence society? 

09:18.330 - 09:20.300 - So if you standardize
09:20.480 - 09:23.971 - windows and everything else in the mid-buildings [and] so forth - (I think he says this 'so forth' but I'm not sure. Doens't really matter if the word's left out I think? 
09:24.296 - 09:25.900 - the cost is les

Good job, everyone!  I mostly removed those introductory words (so, and) and cleaned up some run-on sentences.